A colleague who is living in the simple view of reading and the Science of Reading, said to me those Whole Language believed children learn to reading by osmosis. Reading is hard, there is notinh natural about learning to read. I did not engage him in dogma. Instead I told a story about my grandad and the library. He said the story is cute, but what does it have to do with reading? It takes a village to make readers, children only spend 13% of their lives in school. Maybe you should start thinking about the other 87%. Of course he did not get it, he read off test score data numbers. I said come back to me in 5 years, when those same fixed numbers belong to your camp. The psychometric measures used for literacy in America, guarantee the numbers will reflect failure. Enough silly dogma talk. Let us talk magic.
Osmosis had nothing to do with becoming a read
Just a child in the library, sitting on the floor next to my grandfather. He was reading the Irish Independent from the International Papers section. I said Grandad what am I supposed to read.
His face lit up, his mind started turning, he said wait here, ask the librarian for a copy of Don Quixote by Miquel Cerventes illustrated by Gustave Dore. It was big, old, but something about the leather bonding attracted me to this book I could not yet read, but try I would.
Of course, it open new Grandad/Grandson connections. He took the book out, gave it to me. We renewed that book over and over again for a year. That would set us off on hours of adventure, reading, laughing, imagining, and of course acting it out. There is this magical space between books and people, that literacy researchers overlook. They love to study how teachers teach reading, but ignore the magical stuff.
My grandfather was a World War I veteran who never finished elementary school. But, had the largest home library of any man I have met. He loved Cervantes, Hugo, Tolstoy, Dumas, Dickens, Swift, Wells, and all the Irish and Spanish poets. He could quote from any of them on demand. My dream back then was to read all he read. I am just about caught up to the old man these days. His books keep his memory strong in me. I cannot go to sleep with opening a book, finding that magic hidden in the pages of that magical stuff.
Many Literacy Researchers inform my thinking, but few understand, it is less about how we learn to read and more about why children should become readers. A story comes to life not from the print, but from the mind reading it. The imagination gives reason to reading, not the printed word.
Frank Smith, who sadly no one is reading anymore, always talked about inviting children to join the Literacy Club. He said: "It is infinitely more useful for a child to hear a story told by a person than by a computer. Because the greatest part of the learning experience lies not in the particular words of the story but in the involvement with the individual reading it". My Grandad was a master reader, who was an expert in creating invitations to read.
Frank Smith gets the magic, and magic is never done through osmosis. "We are learning all the time - about the world and about ourselves. We learn without knowing that we are learning and we learn without effort every moment of the day. We learn what is interesting to us... and we learn from what makes sense to us, because there is nothing to learn from what confuses us except that it is confusing." ~ Fank Smith
It would be wise for literacy experts to revisit Frank Smith, spending more time thinking about creative and innovative ways to invite children into the Literacy Club.
Just saying the magic is not on the page, but in the reader. Of course, Louise Rosenblatt told us that in 1978 in her book "The Reader, the Text. the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. She is another seldom-read expert these days. She is not a Podcast, she is a lifetime study for any researcher interested in literacy. Louise always saw the magic, she understood readers bring themselves to the texts, and in partnership with the text something magical happens.
Louise Rosenblatt understands there is no osmosis in involved in reading. "The reader brings to the work personality traits, memories of past events, present needs and preoccupations, a particular mood of the moment and a particular physical condition. These and many other elements in a never-to-be-duplicated combination determine his response to the text." ~ Louise Rosenblatt
I am inspired by old voices and books, Dr. Jesse P. Turner Professor Emeritus of Literacy Just another Literacy Club Kid
